Do Play Console Help articles show a date?

Not on the page. I read six Play Console Help articles on 17 October 2026 and none printed a last-updated date. The footer is a copyright line, 2026 Google, followed by Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. One of the six, the Data safety article, carried a Change log section near the bottom with nine dated entries, the newest dated 5 December 2023. So a change log exists on some articles, but it is the exception and it can itself be years behind.

Can I get a date from the HTTP headers instead?

Not a useful one from Apple. The server does send a Last-Modified header for help pages, but it is the same value for every page in a guide. All six App Store Connect Help pages I checked returned 6 October 2026 at 19:02:41 GMT, to the second. All four App Review Help pages returned 5 October 2026 at 15:54:50 GMT, to the second. That is a publish timestamp for the guide, not an edit date for the article, and treating it as one will tell you a page is fresh when the sentence you care about has not changed in years.

Which first-party store documents do carry a date?

Four that I verified. The App Review Guidelines print Last Updated and a date at the end, and the date is a link to a post listing each change by guideline number. The Developer Program License Agreement prints three dates, one for the agreement and Schedule 1, one for Schedules 2 and 3, one for the exhibits. Apple's Upcoming Requirements page dates every entry on it. And pages on developer.android.com print Last updated and a date in UTC at the foot of the article. Those are the four to reach for when a help page will not tell you how old it is.

Why does a missing date matter if the page is on apple.com?

Because first party and current are different properties, and an undated page cannot tell you which it is. A help page can describe a screen that was renamed, a status that no longer exists or a flow that moved, and nothing on the page signals it. The practical cost is wasted work: you follow a documented path, the button is not there, and you cannot tell whether you misread the page or the page is stale. A date would answer that in one glance, and these pages do not have one.

How do I date a page that carries no date?

Three moves, in order. First, find the same rule in a dated source: the App Review Guidelines, the licence agreement, Upcoming Requirements, or the Android Developers page covering the same topic. Second, read the page for internal evidence, meaning a deadline it describes in future tense that has already passed, or a screen name that no longer matches the console. Third, open the console and look. If none of that settles it, treat the page as undated and say so rather than quoting it as current.

Articles · GuidesOctober 2026

The store help pages carry no date, so you have to date them from outside.

Q: What does Apple's Upcoming Requirements page actually list?

Twenty entries when I read it on 17 October 2026, and every single one was labelled Since a date that had already passed. The newest was dated 9 September 2026 and says apps uploaded to App Store Connect must target iOS 13 or later. The next was dated 28 April 2026 and says uploads must be built with Xcode 26 or later. The oldest was dated 9 November 2022. So the page called Upcoming Requirements listed nothing upcoming. It is a record of requirements already in force, which is useful, but not the deadline list the name promises.

No page in App Store Connect Help, App Review Help or Play Console Help prints the date it was last changed. I fetched sixteen of them on 17 October 2026 and read the source of each one. Not one carried a last-updated line, a revision note or a date of any kind. What each one does carry is a copyright year for the website, which reads 2026 whether the article was edited last week or left alone since 2021. That is the gap this page is about, and it matters most when you are following a documented path while publishing to the App Store.

What follows is which pages I checked, what the HTTP headers do and do not tell you, and the four first-party sources that do print a date. One of them dates every change by guideline number. One of them is called Upcoming Requirements and has nothing upcoming on it.

Start here

The short version

Which store pages carry a date, and which only look like they do?

The help guides do not. App Store Connect Help, App Review Help and Play Console Help all end in a copyright line and nothing else. The documents that do carry a date are the ones that create obligations: the App Review Guidelines, the Developer Program License Agreement, Apple's Upcoming Requirements page, and the Android Developers reference. Those four are dated because somebody has to be able to prove what the rule was on a given day. A help page explaining where a button lives carries no such burden, so it carries no date.

The practical rule that falls out of this: when a help page and a dated document cover the same rule, quote the dated one. When only the help page covers it, say that it is undated. It is a smaller claim than the one most people make, and it is the one the evidence supports.

Which pages did I check, and what was on them?

Six App Store Connect Help pages: app and submission statuses, role permissions, upload builds, add a new app, overview of receiving payments, and sign and update agreements. Four App Review Help pages: appeal to the App Review Board, track a submission's review status, offering account deletion in your app, and provide information for a complete review. Six Play Console Help articles: create and set up your app, the Data safety section, prepare and roll out a release, target API level requirements, set up your app on the app dashboard, and metadata. All sixteen fetched on 17 October 2026.

None of the sixteen printed a date. On the Apple pages there was no date pattern anywhere in the source at all, not in the body, not in the head, not in a hidden field. On the Google pages there is a string that will fool you: search the source for last updated and you find one. It belongs to the Recent cases widget, which lists your own support tickets, and has nothing to do with the article. That is the kind of thing that turns a careful check into a wrong answer.

One of the sixteen came close. The Play Console Help article on the Data safety section carries a Change log heading near the bottom, with nine dated entries and a line saying you can use it to see a revision history for the article. Useful, and rare. Its newest entry was dated 5 December 2023 when I read it. So even the article that keeps a history can leave you looking at a history that stops years short of today.

Apple, App Review Guidelines, read 17 October 2026

Date it

What are you reading, and where is its date?

Pick the kind of document in front of you. Every answer below comes from fetching those pages on 17 October 2026 and reading what was on them.

Prints no date of its own

What to do about it: Date it from outside. The server sends a Last-Modified header, but every page in the guide sends the same one, so it tells you when the guide was published and nothing about this article.

One date I could not find is not the same as no date existing. Where I searched and came up empty, this page says so in those words.

Can the HTTP headers date the page for you?

This is the trick people reach for, and on Apple's help guides it gives a confident wrong answer. The server does send a Last-Modified header. It is just not per page. Every one of the six App Store Connect Help pages I checked returned the same value, 6 October 2026 at 19:02:41 GMT, identical to the second. Every one of the four App Review Help pages returned 5 October 2026 at 15:54:50 GMT, also identical to the second. A whole guide cannot have been edited in one second. That header is when the guide was published, not when the article changed.

The inversion is worth sitting with. The pages that print no date send a header date that looks per page and is not. The one Apple page that does print its own date, the App Review Guidelines, sent no Last-Modified header at all when I asked for it. On the pages I checked I never got both, and the one you can automate is the one you cannot trust.

Google closes that door differently. A headers-only request to a Play Console Help URL came back 404 for me on 17 October 2026, while the same URL fetched normally came back 200. So you cannot read a header date off a Play Console Help page at all, and a script that treats the headers-only response as a liveness check will report live pages as dead.

There is one more trap on the Apple side, and it is worse than a wrong date. A help URL that does not exist returns HTTP 200 with a page titled Page Not Found. Seven of the paths I tried did exactly that. A script checking status codes will record them as healthy, so if you keep a list of documentation links, check the title and not the code. The same habit of reading the page rather than its metadata is what keeps a link audit honest, and it is the reason why apps get rejected is so often explained with numbers nobody can source.

Which first-party sources do print a date?

The App Review Guidelines are the best of them. The document ends in Last Updated and a date, which read 16 October 2026 when I checked it, and the date is a link. Follow it and you get a dated post that lists what moved, by guideline number: a new 2.3.14 covering creative assets, a new 2.5.19 on hidden, dormant or undocumented features that used to sit inside 2.3.1, a clarification to 1.2, a bullet removed from 3.1.1(a), and a clarification to section 5. No other store document tells you that much. One caveat from the same post: translations of the updated guidelines follow within a month, so a non-English copy can be a month behind the English one.

The Developer Program License Agreement dates itself three times over, because its parts move separately. When I read it, the agreement including Schedule 1 was last updated 13 October 2026, Schedules 2 and 3 were last updated 13 October 2026, and the exhibits to Schedules 2 and 3 were last updated 27 August 2026. The page also carries the line that matters most and is quoted least: the version you accept inside your developer account is the binding and most current one, and the web copy is there for convenience. So even on the dated document, the web page is not the authority.

On the Google side the split runs through the company rather than between the two stores. Play Console Help prints no dates. Pages on developer.android.com print Last updated and a date in UTC at the foot of every article, under the content licence note. The page on meeting Play's target API level requirement read 1 October 2026. The Play Billing Library integration page read 15 October 2026. Same company, same rules being described, one surface dated and one not. When both cover your question, quote the dated one.

Android Developers, meet Google Play's target API level requirement, last updated 1 October 2026, read 17 October 2026

What is actually on Apple's Upcoming Requirements page?

Twenty entries, each with its own date label, and on 17 October 2026 every single label began with the word Since. Not one deadline on it was in the future. The newest entry was dated 9 September 2026 and says iOS and iPadOS apps uploaded to App Store Connect must target iOS 13 or later. The second was dated 28 April 2026 and says uploads must be built with Xcode 26 or later, using an SDK for iOS 26, iPadOS 26, tvOS 26, visionOS 26 or watchOS 26. The oldest was dated 9 November 2022.

So the page is a dated record of requirements already in force, and the name oversells it. It is still worth reading, because each entry carries the day its rule started, which is exactly what an undated help page cannot give you. Read the date label under the heading rather than the page title and you can tell whether a rule applied when a given build went up.

One path note, because it cost me a fetch. The live page sits under the news section of Apple's developer site. The support path that looks like it should work returns Apple's Page Not Found with a 200 status code, which is the trap from the section above.

The mirror image of this sits on Google's side. Play Console Help's target API level article carries no date, and in October 2026 it still described a 31 August 2026 deadline in the future tense, saying extension forms would be available in Play Console later this year. Read undated, that reads like a deadline you still have time for. It is not, and the page gives you nothing to catch it with. Budget for that kind of rework the same way you budget for what an app costs to maintain.

Android Developers, target API level requirement, read 17 October 2026

Where a date comes from, source by source

The source	Prints a date	What the date covers	Where to look instead
App Store Connect Help page	No	Nothing. The page ends in the site footer.	One header timestamp shared by the whole guide
App Review Help page	No	Nothing. Same footer as every other Apple page.	One header timestamp shared by the whole guide
Play Console Help article	No	Nothing on most of them.	A Change log section, when the article has one
App Review Guidelines	Yes	The whole document, as Last Updated and a date.	The date links to a post listing each change
Developer Program License Agreement	Yes	Three dates, one for each part of the agreement.	The copy inside your account is the binding one
Upcoming Requirements	Yes	Each entry separately, under its heading.	Read the date label, not the page title
Android Developers page	Yes	The article, as Last updated and a date in UTC.	Printed at the foot, under the licence note

Read 17 October 2026. The two columns on the right are what I could verify, not a promise about pages I did not open.

Where this lands if a builder generated your app

It lands on you, because you are the one who presses submit. App Review Guideline 4.2.6, read 17 October 2026, says apps created from a commercialized template or app generation service will be rejected unless they are submitted directly by the provider of the app's content, and that such services should not submit apps on behalf of their clients. That is why a builder hands you the project rather than filing it for you, and why the store documentation is yours to read.

Newly is an AI app builder. You describe an app and it writes a real React Native and Expo project you own, uploads iOS builds to TestFlight, publishes to Google Play internal testing, builds a standalone Android APK, and keeps two-way GitHub sync so the code stays yours. It is $25 a month, with no free tier. What it does not do is submit to the App Store for you, for the reason in 4.2.6 above.

So the habit in this page is part of the job rather than a side quest. Before you follow a store help page, check whether a dated source covers the same rule, and prefer the dated one. Before you quote a figure to anyone who will plan around it, check whether the page it came from has a date at all. Most of the numbers people repeat about the stores trace back to an undated help page or a forum thread, which is also true of most of the numbers people repeat about what it costs to publish an app.

Questions people ask about dating store documentation

No. I fetched six App Store Connect Help pages and four App Review Help pages on 17 October 2026 and none of them carried a date of any kind. There is no last-updated line, no revision note and no date in the page source. The last line on each one is the site footer, which reads Copyright 2026 Apple Inc. All rights reserved. That is a copyright year for the website, not a date for the article, and it reads the same on a page edited last week and a page untouched for three years.

Check the date before you build to the page

Find the dated source first, then build. It costs you one extra tab and saves the afternoon you would otherwise spend looking for a button that moved two releases ago.

Start building